I sent the slides with a request to the
EMO for scheduling a review. I’ll post any further information once I have it.
From:
mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tsvetkov, Krum
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. April 2010
15:03
To: Memory Analyzer Dev list
Subject: RE: [mat-dev] Graduation
Review Slides Draft
Thank you for the quick response!
I incorporated your changes.
I added also on page 7 a comment where we
want to move J
•
After graduation
the Memory Analyzer project will move from Technology to Tools top-level
project
And also modified the point committers
adding that now new committers are expected:
- No new committers are
expected. All current committers should be moved
I didn’t understand your suggestion for
page 11. I think for a very high-level picture we can live with this one for
the moment.
I will attach the updated document in a
minute…
Regards,
Krum
From: mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Andrew Johnson
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. April 2010
14:14
To: Memory Analyzer Dev list
Subject: Re: [mat-dev] Graduation
Review Slides Draft
It generally looks good -
page 2
It works
fine with multi-million objects heap dumps
and
can quickly point to the suspicious object and who is retaining
them
in the heap.
suspicious
object is singular, them is plural, so should it be suspicious objects?
page 3
Adopters
should
we add an extra item like
Some
additional query and parser plugins are being written as shown by questions on
the forum
70.000
-> 70,000 (German -> US style)
page 9
Diagnostic
Tooling Framework for Java
page
11
should
the DTFJ parser have a notch for the DTFJ implementation to connect to?
page
14
No
feature is removed end-of-live
end-of-live
-> end-of-life ?
what
does this mean? No features have been removed?
I'll
see if there is anything here we need to address:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Criteria_for_Graduating_from_Incubation_Phase_to_Mature_Phase
The
release review part feels slim compared with other commercial products I've
worked on - I don't know whether we need more for Eclipse.org
Andrew
Johnson
|
From:
|
"Tsvetkov, Krum" <krum.tsvetkov@xxxxxxx>
|
|
To:
|
"mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
Date:
|
22/04/2010 11:31
|
|
Subject:
|
[mat-dev] Graduation Review Slides Draft
|
|
Sent by:
|
mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
Hi,
I have
attached my proposal for slides needed for the review to bug 299253: Create
docuware for the 1.0 release ( https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=299253 ) .
Please
comment if you think I should do any changes now. I will send the slides to the
PMC/EMO later today and will request a review. If the documentation is ok we
have a chance to get a review date next week. Otherwise two weeks later.
I
attached to the same bug also the approved IP Log.
Krum Tsvetkov
SAP AG
www.sap.com
http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx
_______________________________________________
mat-dev mailing list
mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mat-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England
and Wales
with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41,
North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
