Re: [m2m-iwg] revised logos

["Nicholas O'Leary" <nick.oleary@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ian,

I agree with you - Concept A, right-hand 2nd row as the main icon, and left-hand 1st row for occasions the smaller squares don't work.

Nick

On 27 January 2014 19:36, Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

All,

 

Here is a revised set of logos based on the previous concepts A & B.

 

My preference and recommendation would be concept A. I would suggest we use the version on the right side of the second row. For instances where the small square don’t work, I think we could use the simplified version on the first row.

 

I am also perfectly happy with concept B so I will not be offended if others have different recommendations.

 

I appreciate everyone’s feedback and suggestions. I do think this needs to be a final decision of the working group members so I would particularly like to hear from Sierra Wireless, Eurotech, ibh, Bitreacticve, IBM, 2lementry and Axeda.

 

 

Thanks

Ian

 

 

 

Ian Skerrett

VP Marketing

Eclipse Foundation

@ianskerrett

 

 

_______________________________________________
m2m-iwg mailing list
m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg