Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [m2m-iwg] M2M Top-Level Project

Benjamin,

 

I agree that writing the scope of such a top-level project will be difficult. As we’ve discussed in the past, part of the problem is that there are a number of terms out there that overlap in meaning: machine-to-machine, internet of things, internet of everything, etc.  Coming up with a scope that is inclusive but still finite is going to be a challenge. The M2M working group has the same challenge.

 

I like your suggested theme of “Connecting”. Are you suggesting that as a potential scope statement, or as the name of the top-level project?

 

Mike Milinkovich

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

+1.613.220.3223

 

From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Benjamin Cabé
Sent: June-17-13 9:26 AM
To: m2m Industry Working Group
Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] M2M Top-Level Project

 

Hi Mike, all,

 

+1, definitely. I think a top-level project would really help to federate M2M projects under a common umbrella.

It would be good to discuss what domains we would like the top-level project to cover. At the moment the M2M IWG charter states that it coordinates the work around tools, frameworks and protocols for M2M ; which is probably a good basis for a top-level project charter. However, I think we should be more clear regarding the fact that some projects are targeting constrained embedded devices (Mihini, Paho clients), and some other target full-fledged servers (e.g. Ponte). Also, the M2M IWG as of today is very much focused on enabling M2M by providing the basic building blocks (device management, communication protocols etc.), while I think there should also be room for technologies that are further down the development chain, especially the ones allowing the development of end-user applications making use of M2M data.

 

From a very high-level perspective, I'd like to have a top-level project with a tagline that could be "Connecting". Connecting machines to machines (embedded agents, protocols, brokers, protocol "adapters"…), connecting developers to machines (tools, debuggers, simulators, code generators …), connecting end-users to machines (SCADA, visual dashboards, …). What are your thoughts?

 

Benjamin-- 

 

 

De : Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Société : Eclipse Foundation
Répondre à : "mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>, m2m Industry Working Group <m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : mardi 11 juin 2013 21:02
À : "m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx" <m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : [m2m-iwg] M2M Top-Level Project

 

All,

 

The M2M working group has been pretty successful in recruiting projects. Has the time come to consider creating a new top-level project to help create a cohesive project community for our M2M technologies?

 

For those who are unfamiliar with them, top-level projects are the mechanism which ties a collection of projects in a particular domain to the Eclipse development and IP processes. It requires the creation of a project management committee (PMC), the appointment of a PMC leader, and having a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.

 

Mike Milinkovich

Executive Director

Eclipse Foundation

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

+1.613.220.3223 mobile

+1.613.224.9461 x228 office

@mmilinkov

 


Back to the top