Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP

[UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well it sounds fair, except that the example for GET/temperature

uses a rather inappropriate unit code "22.5 C" which according to the UCUM standard means "velocity of light"  

not temperature

The correct code would be "22.5 CEL" not really an overhead IMHO even when dealing with small scale systems. While some of the other units mentioned in relation to data transfer like "kbit/s" look sound, rather similar to the Unit-API implementation I wrote for BT a little while ago (a smaller scale version of UOMo, e.g. no UCUM support)

Regards,

Werner

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:00 PM, <m2m-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Send m2m-iwg mailing list submissions to
        m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        m2m-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        m2m-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of m2m-iwg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: COAP (Julien Vermillard)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:44:01 +0200
From: Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@xxxxxxxxx>
To: m2m Industry Working Group <m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Message-ID:
        <CAN9CcB_aj6CEVFsDhYwsEhLDprZc8OAH0f2J8APZbSbyeJwtcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Since CoAP is coming thru the OMA lightweight M2M and OneM2M standards we
will need a rock solid open-source implementation ;)

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:54 PM, andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx <
andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Biggest issue with COAP so far has been lack of solid implementations. As
> others have said, it has some applicability, but probably not as broad as
> the authors might have hoped.
>
>
> On Friday, April 12, 2013, Ian Skerrett wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have experience with Constrained Application Protocol
>> (CoAP).  It certainly looks applicable in our space.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
> --
> Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
> blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
> twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper
>
> _______________________________________________
> m2m-iwg mailing list
> m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/m2m-iwg/attachments/20130415/2984d353/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
m2m-iwg mailing list
m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg


End of m2m-iwg Digest, Vol 18, Issue 11
***************************************