Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP

From: "andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx" <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:54:59 +0100
Delivered-to: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/m2m-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Biggest issue with COAP so far has been lack of solid implementations. As others have said, it has some applicability, but probably not as broad as the authors might have hoped.

On Friday, April 12, 2013, Ian Skerrett wrote:

Does anyone have experience with Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP). It certainly looks applicable in our space.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/

--
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk | skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper | images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
  - From: Julien Vermillard

References:
- [m2m-iwg] COAP
  - From: Ian Skerrett

Prev by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Next by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Previous by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Next by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs