| Re: [m2m-iwg] AXEDA Comments on MQTT contribution to ECLIPSE PAHO & OASIS |
Here’s the call for a TC charter for MQTT. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-charter-discuss/201301/msg00008.html From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Bullotta Well, someone at OASIS is trying to bring MQTT under their auspices, as I’ve received specific solicitations to that effect asking if we wanted to participate… Also, I think a LOT more focus needs to be placed on some of the significant functional gaps in the current MQTT protocol, and on capabilities that would greatly improve interoperability and integration. Notably, these include: - Discovery capabilities - Stronger typing and metadata for payloads - Semantics for data, events, services, blob/file and stream content (all essential for a modern M2M platform) - Standardizing a REST API model - Store-and-forward best practices/reference implementations for occasionally connected devices - …and so on… Those items would go a long way towards helping MQTT achieve its full potential as a general purpose M2M protocol, API, and standard. Rick Bullotta ThingWorx From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of UOMo All, Thanks a lot for the update. I was about to ask about Paho as opposed to the Lua tools earlier, but had to re-subscribe due to that strange GMX mail bug with Eclipse.org. At the moment, it doesn't look like there's a Paho or Java/C related M2M package under the Kepler release train, or did I miss something? Should it still be part of those trains, how about Eclipse for Mobile Developers: http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/packages/eclipse-mobile-developers/junosr1 It contains both C and Java support, so it might be a good foundation for Paho. Not sure, what's it with OASIS? It is mentioned a few time, but the message does not refer directly to anything by OASIS. There is of course an OASIS standard, UnitsML often used as transfer format to the UCUM standard and codes: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=unitsml Interesting, so while MQTT isn't an OASIS standard, it looks like AMQP is about to become one?;-) Those of you dealing with OASIS might have seen this comparison then: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/amqp/201202/msg00086/StormMQ_WhitePaper_-_A_Comparison_of_AMQP_and_MQTT.pdf Werner |