| [m2m-iwg] M2M meta-model feedback |
Hi, In the last couple weekly calls, I have been talking mentioning the prototype of M2M meta-model (focused on "data tree" description at the moment) that the Koneki team has been working on. We have put a first version of this model in Koneki's git repository [1], and you can learn more about it by giving a quick glance at [2]. Please feel free to give feedback on the terminology, scope, etc. We will try to provide an example of an instance of this meta-model soon, as well as a prototype initializing an OMA-DM simulation out of a model, so as you can better understand what it can be used for. It is still to be discussed how far this "Thing" model should go in terms of describing the data, e.g. it might make sense to bring a bit more semantics to it, such as being to able to specify the physical quantity of a Property… My opinion though is that the model should be kept as simple as possible, while still enabling "extension models" that'll bring added semantics (units, encoding/serialization hints, …) Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, Benjamin. |