| Re: [m2m-iwg] RWW article |
Joe, Welcome! Not sure if you've seen it, but Andy Piper's blog post, and the links included at the end might provide some assistance. http://andypiper.co.uk/2011/11/04/mqtt-goes-free-a-personal-qa/ I will let Andy and others more qualified comment on the RWW article. There are project-specific mailing lists and forums. Koneki: https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/koneki-dev http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/f/221/ Paho is still in the project proposal phase, so it's lists and forums have not yet been set up. From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Biron Hello all, I am new to this list. First post. What do you all think about this RWW article I actually found many of the statements in the article strangely phrased, or not entirely logical. The comparison to http didn't make a lot of sense, strange comment about intelligence vs. autonomy, etc. I'm wondering if the reporter mixed up some of Andy Piper's comments. I was hoping this article would provide a "theory of operation" for MQTT, which I found lacking in the spec. What is the expected use of the protocol? The article says "it was not designed for messaging but facebook is experimenting". Great – so what WAS it designed for? Unfortunately this article did not help. Any pointers there? P.S. Is this the only mailing list related to M2M on eclipse? This one is for the working group, but is there another more specific list for Paho and Koneki? Thanks, JB ___________________________________________ Joseph Biron (Axeda Corporation) { title: Sr Director, Product Innovation, contact: [508.446.5439 , jbiron@xxxxxxxxx], web: [www.axeda.com, developer.axeda.com, @bironology] } |