Re: [m2e-users] Anyone want checkstyle and PMD?

[Benson Margulies <bimargulies@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've asked if the OSSRH repo could serve as a p2 deployment target for
this purpose. As for keeping the source together, well, we could I
suppose go to codehaus :-)

Eclipse and Google produce 'Eclipse Labs', but that's just Google Code
(for better or worse) with a different mustache.


On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Anders Hammar <anders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right, I forgot that m2e is moving to Eclipse Foundation.
> Maybe some kind of umbrella for "m2e extras outside ef" plugins? What I'm
> basically looking for is some simple way of keeping all these glue plugins
> that should be created to connection the existing eclipse plugins with the
> Maven world (i.e. the pom) together. Having them spread out will make it
> cumbersome for the users.
> Maybe the simplest solution is just to have them listed somewhere?
>
> /Anders
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:48, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Gang,
>>
>> The problem with pushing these to their corresponding plugins is that
>> m2e is moving much, much, faster than CS and PMD at this point.
>>
>> As far as 'extras' is concerned, there might be an IP issue. I started
>> this code with the m2e-extensions project on google code. The author
>> there did not attach copyrights to the source. I communicated with him
>> by private email and then put the copyrights in for him (and for me)
>> and that's what's reflected at github. But whether it could get
>> through EF IP clearance is another question altogether.
>>
>> --benson
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Anders Hammar <anders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Sure, it's up to the m2e team. But unless someone brings up the question
>> > nothing will happen.
>> > M2Eclipse WTP support is already managed by someone not employed by
>> > Sonatype, so I don't see that as an issue. The only problem that I see
>> > is
>> > that this kind of feature doesn't belong within m2eclipse, but possibly
>> > within the Checkstyle and PMD projects.
>> >
>> > Anyone from the m2e team, or Jason, what's your opinion?
>> >
>> > /Anders
>> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:50, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> That's a question for the Sonatypists, is it not?
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Anders Hammar <anders@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Any chance this could be moved to m2eclipse Extras instead?
>> >> >
>> >> > /Anders
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 01:37, Benson Margulies
>> >> > <bimargulies@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think I've got working plugins for Checkstyle and PMD that work
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> 0.12.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You can find them here.
>> >> >> http://bimargulies.github.com/m2e-code-quality/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If anyone out there, in fact, really wants to use these let alone
>> >> >> help
>> >> >> me with them, we should come up with some other venue to discuss
>> >> >> rather than abuse the hospitality of this list.
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> m2e-users mailing list
>> >> >> m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > m2e-users mailing list
>> >> > m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> m2e-users mailing list
>> >> m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m2e-users mailing list
>> > m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> m2e-users mailing list
>> m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m2e-users mailing list
> m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>
>