| Re: [lyo-dev] Any objections to changing OSLC4J project names? |
Hi Samuel,* org.eclipse.lyo.oslc4j.core
Yes I think it is a good idea to follow the naming conventions of Eclipse projects. But I have a suggestion for Lyo project names: I think rather to:
* org.eclipse.lyo.oslc4j.provider.jena
* org.eclipse.lyo.oslc4j.provider.json4j
* org.eclipse.lyo.oslc4j.wink
* ...--
2013/7/9 Samuel Padgett <spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx>I am considering changing the OSLC4J project names to match the conventions used elsewhere in Lyo. So instead of
OSLC4J/
we'd have
org.eclipse.lyo.core.oslc4j/
(and the same for the other dozen or so projects). Does anyone object?
If you have these projects loaded, you will probably need to remove them from your Eclipse workspace and re-import them. We will also need to update the Lyo wiki pages and Hudson build scripts for the new names.
--
Samuel Padgett | IBM Rational | spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev
Cordialement,
Idrissa Abdoulaye DIENG
----------------------------------------