Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [location-iwg] incubation proposal review and progress
Um you guys need to relax; the proposal is fine and straight forward[*]. 

The only reason I am going slow at all is because the examples provided are not specific to an "industry working group".

Q: Andrew do you have an example of a proposal made to another industry working group? It would show us how to adapt the proposal template for LocationTech.

If anyone is planning on doing a proposal please joint the discussion on the mailing list and we
can try and get our questions answered. Indeed it may be easier to ask the questions when not
writing up your own project.

-- 
Jody Garnett
[*] I like that it is a proposal, and not mixed up with questions from different groups (as example the OSGeo incubation application mixes up project description along with hosting requirements etc…).

On Sunday, 9 September 2012 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:

Thank you Jody & Wayne.

I've been talking to some of the other projects interested in hosting at LocationTech. It's fair to say they're a bit nervous about the work involved to do the proposal. Suffice it to say, we'll be working to streamline this so it's really not a big deal.

Thank you again Jody for being a guinea pig and slogging through the first proposal ever for LocationTech.

Andrew

On 8 September 2012 23:30, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wayne was kind enough to catch up with an initial review:

He has touched on a number of the email threads started previously. The long and short of it is that the
example template will need to be pretty tweaked around into a LocationTech example.

As I go through Wayne's feedback I will update this email list with my notes.
-- 
Jody Garnett



_______________________________________________
location-iwg mailing list

Back to the top