Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng and Luna

[Alexandre Montplaisir <alexmonthy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Great!

Ok we just discussed it, we still have a couple patches pending for
lttng-luna, so we'll try to get them in today. We'll merge luna into
master tomorrow.

Thanks,
Alexandre

On 13-12-04 12:52 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> No need to wait at all. Master is open for luna now and parent pom set to 3.0.
>
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Alexandre Montplaisir" <alexmonthy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Linux Tools developer discussions" <linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 7:43:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng and Luna
>>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> I'd like to merge lttng-luna in as soon as possible. Should we wait for
>> something to be changed in master before we do so?
>>
>> As far as I can tell, we don't use anything that is Luna-specific (I
>> always use the 4.3 target definition to compile).
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On 13-12-04 11:05 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>>> Lttng devs,
>>> What is your plan to merge lttng-luna branch into master and killing
>>> lttng-luna branch?
>>> Do you use any luna specific APIs making it impossible to compile against
>>> Kepler platform? PTP changed the remote tools so we would need a bit more
>>> time before we can start compiling against Luna release train in master
>>> (unless someone jumps in to help). Let's get 3.0 discussion ongoing with
>>> this mail and add anything you were think of.
>>>
>>> Alexander Kurtakov
>>> Red Hat Eclipse team
>>