Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] TMF and pluggable state providers

Ah, thanks Patrick! 

I had that code snippet commented out with a FIXME comment on it as it seemed to change from the version that I started with to the current version and I had not yet figured out what the correct syntax was.  I will give that a go.

Sensible time stamp formatting is another thing I am going to have to figure out.  If the state viewer really does end up being trace agnostic like I am aiming for, then how the timestamps are formatted probably also should be data driven.  You are of course correct that the timestamps I am using right now are all epoch based.

Aaron


Hi Aaron,

Nice work!

You might want to try this on your time graph combo since your time stamps seem to be epoch-based:

timeGraphCombo.getTimeGraphViewer().setTimeFormat(TimeFormat.CALENDAR);

Patrick

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Aaron Spear <aspear@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think that I can see your point though, it would perhaps be useful to see
> explicitly which methods are upstack at a given moment. Next week I will try
> to create a different state/color for a function being "up stack" and see
> how that looks.

Michel,

FYI here is another screenshot showing the java tracer changed a bit so that when a context is up stack it has a different state.

Aaron

_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev



_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev


Back to the top