Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

[sami wagiaalla <swagiaal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 1.) Keep existing stable naming scheme
> 2.) Decide a few simple rules for "namespacing" experimental/feature
>      work
>
> Does that sound right?

Hi Severin,

I saw the updates you have made to the guide lines. I have some more 
thoughts now that Jeff has created a branch using these guidelines. To 
me the name origin/feature/autotools/autotools-to-cdt seems too long and 
complicated. I think jjonston-autotools-to-cdt conveys the same meaning, 
is simpler, and leaves no uncertainty that this is an experimental 
branch. WDYT ?

  Sami