[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project
|
I am not a developer for Linux Tools, but I'll interject in this discussion briefly to mention that you don't necessarily need a separate repository for eclipse-build. You can have more than one root commit in a git object database. I don't know if that would really offer any advantages over having two separate repositories, though it might make it slightly nicer if you ever have reason to move/copy code between eclipse-build and the rest of the projects.
On Friday, 21 January 2011, at 8:06 pm, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 21.01.2011, 16:29 -0500 schrieb Andrew Overholt:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We need to decide on our git repository structure. I propose we retain
> > one repository. The structure can remain the same as it is now in SVN:
> >
> > org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/
> > autotools/
> > changelog/
> > eclipse-build/
> > gcov/
> > gprof/
> > libhover/
> > lttng/
> > man/
> > oprofile/
> > p2-update-checker/
> > proctools/
> > profiling/
> > releng/
> > rpm/
> > rpmstubby/
> > sdktests/
> > systemtap/
> > valgrind/
> >
> > Is anyone against this?
>
> I would prefer to have a separate repository for eclipse-build.
>
>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature