[linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:29:33 -0500
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)

Hi,

We need to decide on our git repository structure.  I propose we retain
one repository.  The structure can remain the same as it is now in SVN:

org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/
 autotools/
 changelog/
 eclipse-build/
 gcov/
 gprof/
 libhover/
 lttng/
 man/
 oprofile/
 p2-update-checker/
 proctools/
 profiling/
 releng/
 rpm/
 rpmstubby/
 sdktests/
 systemtap/
 valgrind/

Is anyone against this?

Thanks,

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project
  - From: Andrew Overholt
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project
  - From: Xavier RAYNAUD
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project
  - From: Benjamin Drung

Prev by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.7 release again
Next by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Move to git ... let's vote
Previous by thread: [linuxtools-dev] 0.7 release again
Next by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposing a single git repository for the project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs