Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: AW: AW: [jwt-dev] JWT Galileo M5 build

Hi all,

Points 1, 2 and 4 are solved.
I kicked a new integration build. It will take time before the download site is updated, Once you see that http://download.eclipse.org/technology/jwt/integration-update-site/site.xml mentions version 0.6.0.I20090209-1025 for the feature, please update and try it and ensure it does not break anything.

Then if everything is OK, I'll start the stable build and use it in Galileo tonight.

Regards,
Mickael



Florian Lautenbacher a écrit :
Hi Mickael,

concerning the stable build: First thing is, that the plugin gets installed
without problems in my Eclipse and Eclipse can startup well, so the most
important thing (it hopefully doesn't break the build) seems to be
fulfilled.

On the functionality side however, I have some remarks:

#1) I would remove the conf-model editor from the current builds. This is
simply an EMF-generated wizard that doesn't do anything helpful at the
moment and should be refactored or refined in my opinion. For the moment for
the test users of Galileo it is probably more confusing than helpful,
therefore we should not integrate it into the build (remove it from the CVS
list)

#2) When creating a new workflow file (see bug 264172) then the workflow is
not opened, but only a new file is created in the workspace. This is
something we should definitely fix fast.

#3) When opening the workflow editor with a concrete workflow file, then a
lot of warnings are displayed (as described in bug 263959). These should be
removed for one of the next builds.

#4) As mentioned in bug 251697, the icons in the standard toolbar should be
removed (for one of the next builds).

#5) And, additionally, we should provide some examples workflows as
specified in bug 261010.

Surely, there are a lot of more bugs in our bugzilla, but these are the most
obvious ones for other people testing JWT in the Galileo milestone build.

I hope that you can already fix #1 (conf-model editor) for todays stable
build and maybe also #2, the rest of these bugs we will need to work on in
the next weeks and months.

Besides these, you have my "Go" for the stable build ;-)

Best regards,

Florian


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Mickael Istria
Gesendet: 09 February 2009 14:05
An: Java Workflow Toolbox
Betreff: Re: AW: [jwt-dev] JWT Galileo M5 build

Hi Christian,

Indeed, I cannot remember of critic changes. Probably the biggest update
since last milestone comes from internationalization and messages bundles.

A new integration build is available on integration update site. Please
install it and ensure everything is fine, then I'll rebuild it as "Stable".

Mickael


Christian Saad a écrit :
Hi Mickael,

it would be ok for me. I think there haven't been much large changes in the head in the last weeks anyway?

Regards,
Chris

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Mickael Istria
Gesendet: Montag, 9. Februar 2009 13:30
An: Java Workflow Toolbox
Betreff: [jwt-dev] JWT Galileo M5 build

Hi all,

Tomorrow is Galileo M5+3. Then we have to provide a build of JWT to be included in the Galileo M5 build.

I propose that we produce the stable milestone and update the Galileo build files this afternoon (let's say at 3:00 pm). Any objection?

Regards,
Mickael
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev

_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev

_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev



Back to the top