Re: [jwt-dev] Back again, flying over the emails

[Marc Dutoo <marc.dutoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Florian,

Welcome back ! Hope you've had a good time ^^

Thanks for the useful information about making a release there : 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/JWT_DeveloperFAQ , I'll add more of my own - 
though maybe it should go in its own page.

I've tried to test JWT 0.5 without the update site, but how do you 
install the downloadable jars ?

I'll be at the ESE and the STPIM meeting. If we can also meet  at other 
times, for work or non-work purpose, that will be fine. Keep you up to 
date ;)

I'm available today or tomorrow for a conf call ; today would be perfect.

Regards,
Marc

Florian Lautenbacher a écrit :
> Hi there,
>  
> as I'm back from vacation now, I'm trying to read through all the 
> emails that have been written during the last weeks concerning JWT. If 
> you are waiting for a reply to your email, please just wait a few days 
> more and I'll answer asap.
>  
> I'm happy to see that finally the release 0.5 has been finished and 
> can now be uploaded to the website. So we can now focus on release 0.6 
> which will fully focus on vendors and  how they can extend and modify 
> the workflow editor. This release is currently planned for the middle 
> of December; let's keep the fingers crossed that we can hold this 
> deadline.
>  
> Since the Eclipse Summit Europe is already in two weeks, I hope to see 
> many of you guys to discuss topics concerning JWT. As I've seen on the 
> STP-mailing list, the committers from STP plan to have a meeting in 
> advance on the 18th. I will also be coming to Ludwigsburg on the 18th 
> already, so I hope to join the STP meeting together with some others 
> from JWT mabe. Who of you is planning to be there and from when to 
> when? (I'm there from 18th lunch till 20th till the end of the 
> conference).
>  
> I've also seen a lot of emails concerning CQs: thanks to Mickael and 
> Chris who finally found out when a CQ is needed and when not. The last 
> time I'd contacted Sharon, I got the impression that every time a new 
> component is added to JWT (doesn't matter whether written by 
> committers during the project or not), we need a CQ. It is good to 
> know that this is not the case and especially the small extensions 
> we've written for transformations, views, etc. can easily be 
> committed. Sorry for the confusion that arose from this impression!
>  
> Thanks, Marc, for creating a Wiki page for the discussion how JWT and 
> STP might belong together and where the differences are. I'll try to 
> fill this page with more life in the next few days.
>  
> The requirements specified by Pierre are also very fruitful for our 
> planning for the next releases. I will go through the list of 
> requirements and will discuss with others what we will be able to do 
> and till when and integrate these issues into our project plan as well 
> as create bug entries for each of those.
>  
> There have also been many other discussions (e.g. with JBoss) which I 
> would like to get to know in more detail, so I guess a phone 
> conference would be a good thing in this or the coming week. Marc, 
> what about your availability in the next few days?
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Florian
>  
>  
> ---------------------------------------
>  Dipl.-Inf. Florian Lautenbacher
>  
>  Programming Distributed Systems Lab
>  Institute of Computer Science
>  University of Augsburg
>  Universitätsstr. 14
>  86135 Augsburg, Germany
>  
>  Attention: NEW phone number!
>  phone:  +49 821 598-3102
>  fax:    +49 821 598-2175
>  
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jwt-dev mailing list
> jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
>