Re: [jwt-dev] AgilPro vs. JWT vs. XPDL

[Marc Dutoo <marc.dutoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Steve

This is indeed an impressive and thourough side-by-side analysis.

I admit, as much there are "red areas" in the current AgilPro support of 
XPDL, I get the feeling we've made a breakthrough toward XPDL support in 
JWT ;)

On another subject, the SCOrWare vs JWT architecture is not done yet on 
my side, but I'm working ont it.

Regards
Marc Dutoo
Open Wide

Florian Lautenbacher wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> thank you very much for this detailed comparison between AgilPro and XPDL. I
> stored the file in our wiki at
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/JWT_Metamodel#Metamodel_and_XPDL_1.0.
>
> Additionally, I received a document from eMundo which compares how the
> AgilPro integration and adapter framework fits to the vision of JWT WAM.
> Please find the file attached to this email as well as on our wiki at
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Java_Workflow_Toolbox_Project#JWT_and_Agil
> Pro.
>
> Things are moving and thats quite good! :-)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Florian
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
> Auftrag von Steve.Egbert@xxxxxxxx
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 03:12
> An: jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [jwt-dev] AgilPro metamodel vs XPDL schema comparison
>
>
> Attached is the initial revision of the document comparing the AgilPro
> metamodel with the XPDL 1.0 schema.
> It covers all the XPDL elements as well as the Bonita engine vendor specific
> extensions.
> Someone with a knowledge of other workflow engines should probably address
> their vendor specific extensions.
>
> Steve Egbert
>
> (See attached file: AgilPro Metamodel.doc)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jwt-dev mailing list
> jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev