Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow

That would be acceptable as well.

Stephan, can you open a bug report and share it here? You can mention the idea I raised and also the one from Mickael.

Dani



From:        Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        "Eclipse JDT general developers list." <jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        14.05.2020 18:23
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
Sent by:        jdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx






On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:13 PM Daniel Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am also not a fan of auto-closing but I like the idea to ping the author to verify whether the bug is still relevant. I'm not sure whether the webmaster can do this, but maybe we could add a comment, mark it stale (not in subject) and only send a note to the author.

I imagine the same bot that does add a Bugzilla comment or change bug status could be tweaked to directly send a mail to the author to ask them for verification with comment or closing action, without directly touching the bug (then avoiding notifications).
What do you think?_______________________________________________
jdt-dev mailing list
jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-dev




Back to the top