[jdt-dev] org.eclipse.jdt.core.jdom.IDOMType

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jdt-dev] org.eclipse.jdt.core.jdom.IDOMType

From: "Vijayan" <kvijayan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:04:08 +0530
Delivered-to: jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/jdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:jdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-dev>, <mailto:jdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-dev>, <mailto:jdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

I am facing the following problems. Can anyone give a solution for this :

When I am passing new String[0] as a parameter to the setSuperInterfaces(String[] interfaceNames) API of org.eclipse.jdt.core.jdom.IDOMType , it does not remove the interface name from the class definition if one exists previously.
When I am passing null as a parameter to the setSuperclass(String superclassName) API of org.eclipse.jdt.core.jdom.IDOMType , it does not remove the superclass name from the class definition if one exists previously.

Regards,

Vijayan

Prev by Date: RE: [jdt-dev] JDT compiler generating other SUID than Sun's javac
Next by Date: [jdt-dev] Vladimir Shcherbina/Haifa/IBM is out of the office.
Previous by thread: [jdt-dev] JDT compiler generating other SUID than Sun's javac
Next by thread: [jdt-dev] Vladimir Shcherbina/Haifa/IBM is out of the office.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top