Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jdt-core-dev] Some bytecode (class files) are different between batch compiler and Eclipse

Thanks, I will move the discussion to the forum.

Wei

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Stephan Herrmann
<stephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> let's please have this discussion in the forum [1], since this
> list is intended for internal discussion within the team, OK?
>
> To help find out the cause behind those differences you might
> want to write a forum post with both configurations attached:
> the command line options and the preference file
> (.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs).
> Also hints to what differences you see would be helpful.
>
> best,
> Stephan
>
> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/f/13/
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Wei Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We recently noticed that for some of our classes, the bytecode class
>> files are different between the commandline batch compiler (invoked
>> via ant) and eclipse. It doesn't happen to all of our classes, but
>> many of them are different. Ideally we would like to see the class
>> binaries to be the same from development (eclipse) to production
>> (ant).
>>
>> We have ruled out most of the compiler settings (e.g. java level,
>> debug info, and etc). And clueless at this time. Can someone shed some
>> light?
>>
>> Details:
>> Development is using MyEclipse 10.6 (Eclipse indigo based)
>> Production build is performed by Ant 1.8.2 which uses
>> org.eclipse.jdt.core-3.7.3.v20120119-1537.jar that copied our of the
>> MyEclipse 10.6 installation.
>> java source/target level: 1.6
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>> Wei
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdt-core-dev mailing list
>> jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jdt-core-dev mailing list
> jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev


Back to the top