[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [jdt-core-dev] [1.5] JCK 1.5 compliance level is 96.60%
|
We are not pretending shooting for an initial bug free implementation,
since we do not have comprehensive test suites (the JCKs do not have enough
coverage).
Also remember that we have to implement 1.5 support in more than the
Eclipse compiler. We want to leverage generic support throughout our
various tools/API before starting addressing a subsequent feature. There
are some opportunities for piping efforts, as team members become
available.
Happily, generics are by far the biggest piece in 1.5, and once we handle
them, the rest should follow quite smoothly.
We still haven't come up with an early date for exposing the full 1.5
support, it is officially planned for 3.1, but we hope to be able to expose
it much sooner than the official release.
Steven Buroff
<sburoff@optonlin
e.net> To
Sent by: jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
jdt-core-dev-admi cc
n@xxxxxxxxxxx Steven Buroff
<sburoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
07/29/2004 03:10 RE: [jdt-core-dev] [1.5] JCK 1.5
PM compliance level is 96.60%
Please respond to
jdt-core-dev
Any idea when a drop with basic implementations of all features
(possibly excepting annotations) will be available? Personally,
I think getting a basic implementation of all features should be
a higher priority than getting generics and enhanced for loops
bug free. A think a drop with a basic implementation of all features
but with bugs in some obscure test cases would be of more use
to more people than a bug-free implementation of only 2 of the
features.
Steve Buroff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdt-core-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jdt-core-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philippe P Mulet
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 6:17 AM
> To: jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [jdt-core-dev] [1.5] JCK 1.5 compliance level is 96.60%
>
>
>
>
>
> Still 357 failures to go out of 10506 tests.
>
> Note1: This includes failures on non yet supported features like
> autoboxing, enumeration, varargs, static imports and annotations.
> Note2: In the past we had better ranking, but this was
> obtained with an
> earlier drop of JCKs, which had far less test coverage.
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdt-core-dev mailing list
> jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-core-dev mailing list
jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
