Re: [jdt-core-dev] correct usage of WorkingCopyOwner

["Adam Kiezun" <adam.kiezun@xxxxxxx>]

> You got the basic idea, what you did should just have worked. In term, in
> order to grab a default buffer implementation, our abstract owner
> implementation should do exactly what you did as a workaround.
> Jerome is currently writing some tests for this new functionality, we will
> add one for your scenario.

cool,
Philippe, can you post something here once you have the test case and I can see whether I made a mistake 
or there was a bug on the jcore side?

thanks
a.