[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [imp-dev] Missing CQ for Shrike 1.1.3
|
It is a requirement for participation on the release train.
At some point, we're going to turn Orbit into a proper p2/Maven
repository of "bundlified" libraries; a sort-of one-stop-shop for
building OSGi applications.
So, there's a element of "good housekeeping"/"good neighbour" to it.
Wayne
Robert M. Fuhrer wrote:
Hi Wayne,
As for moving these other 3rd-party bundles into Orbit, my
understanding was that Orbit is mainly intended to make it easier for
*multiple* projects to use 3rd-party bundles legally. Or at least,
it's only worth the extra work if multiple projects want to use the
bundle.
To date, no other project (to my knowledge) has expressed an interest
in Polyglot, shrike or SDF.
If there are other benefits of moving things into Orbit, please feel
free to enlighten me/us. :-)
On Dec 21, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Sorry... there's more.
I've noticed the same thing for Polyglot. You have a CQ for version
2.3.0, but have included 2.4.0 with your update site.
You'll need a CQ for the 2.4.0 version of Polyglot.
Further, there are several "sdf_eclipse_installer_*" files:
sdf_eclipse_installer_1.0.10.jar
sdf_eclipse_installer_linux_x86_1.0.10.jar
sdf_eclipse_installer_macosx_x86_1.0.10.jar
sdf_eclipse_installer_win32_x86_1.0.10.jar
That I can't connect to a CQ. CQ 2107 [1] seems the most promising,
but the version numbers don't match. Can you tell me what the
relationship is between these files and CQ?
Have you considered moving these third-party dependencies to Orbit?
Thanks,
Wayne
[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2107
Wayne Beaton wrote:
Greetings IMP project (CC Technology PMC)
I noticed today that the update site for IMP is distributing Shrike
1.1.3. I can only find a CQ for version 1.1.0.
Our IP Policy requires that you create a CQ for each new version of
any third-party library that you use. Please create a CQ for the new
version. I hope that, based on the status of the project as
incubation-conforming, you will be able to relatively quickly get
parallel IP approval.
Thanks,
Wayne
--
Cheers,
- Bob
-------------------------------------------------
Robert M. Fuhrer
Research Staff Member
Programming Technologies Dept.
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
IMP Project Lead (http://www.eclipse.org/imp)
X10: Productivity for High-Performance Parallel Programming
(http://x10-lang.org)
--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org
I'm going to EclipseCon!
http://www.eclipsecon.org