[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [iam-dev] Rethinking the incremental builder
|
all good ideas abel. i have some ideas about how to do b) which i'll
talk to you about in when i get back from holiday (mid november)
On 10/21/08, Abel Muiño Vizcaino <amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've been thinking about the current situation with the incremental builder
> and I think we can do better on that component.
>
> We can:
> a) be more integrated with jdt
> b) be more conservative on running full builds
> c) be more modular (this is somewhat in conflict with "a")
>
> For point "a", I think we can leverage
> http://tinyurl.com/6oe4m7 and integrate with the java build
> cycle.
> For point "b", we can do a deeper look at the pom so that a whitespace
> change does not trigger a full build.
> For point "c", and based on the above point, we can allow contributors to
> react to changes to the pom. For example, synchronizing the java source
> compliance levels can be done by an external contribution and not be
> hardcoded in the flow.
>
> This is only an sketch, but I would like to hear from you.
>
>
> --
> Abel Muiño Vizcaino - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iam-dev mailing list
> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>
>
