[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [higgins-dev] Clarification needed wrt naming convention forcontext types
|
Technically? Okay, good but what is the syntactical significance of
$context+ldap? Is that an XRDS syntactical convention? XRI? What
is the meaning of this Markus? :)
Tom
>>> "Markus Sabadello" <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 09/09/08 8:41 AM >>>
Hello,
Technically, IdASRegistry just treats the context types as strings - it
doesn't matter what's inside. So you can use "ldap_context" too.
Markus
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Rajalakshmi S Iyer <
iyer_rajalakshmi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a section for a context factory description in the config file -
>
> <Setting Name="JNDIContextFactory" Type="htf:map">
> <Setting Name="Instance"
> Type="xsd:string">JNDIContextFactory</Setting>
> <Setting Name="ContextTypes" Type="htf:list">
> <Setting Name="LDAPContextType"
> Type="xsd:string">$context+ldap</Setting>
> </Setting>
> </Setting>
>
> I want to know if there is any significance attached to naming the LDAP
> context type as '$context+ldap' instead of any other name say
> 'ldap_context'.
>
> Thanks,
> Best regards,
> Rajalakshmi Iyer
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins- dev mailing list
> higgins- dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins- dev
>
