Re: [higgins-dev] SAML utility code

["Tom Doman" <tdoman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, sure, that sounds good.  I know you mentioned that and that Mike
talked about making some of the STS code be utility code but I also need
something for the interim and Jim suggested I get the ball rolling.

But, yes, we should all talk because I don't know what Mike is thinking
with regard to use of axiom or maintaining the org.w3c.dom approach
you did.  I'd like to preserve an org.w3c.dom approach at the utility level.

Is Mike away until next week?

Tom

>>> "Markus Sabadello" <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 06/11/08 4:51 PM >>> 
As I mentioned in my other mail, I have been trying to use STS code in my
SAML2 IdP instead of the utility classes you are referring to.

Since this is all related, maybe the three of us (and anyone else who is
interested) could do an IRC session or telecon some time next week?

Markus

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Tom Doman <tdoman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In order to get the ball rolling and get the SAML code I need, I'm going to
> create an org.eclipse.higgins.util.saml package and, for the time being,
> move a little of the SAML2 IDP code into it and write a little of my own.  I
> need SAML 1.0 document support so I want to use XMLElement from
> saml2idp.saml2 and I figured that if Mike is going to create more
> generalized SAML utility code, mine can go away but the package can remain.
>  At any rate, I am anxious to see utility APIs like what Markus did but that
> supports both SAML 1 & 2.
>
> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins- dev mailing list
> higgins- dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins- dev
>