Re: [higgins-dev] diffs for 222143

["Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, I should say that after hours of pouring over some of the CPs trying to tease apart occurrences of dom nodes and jena from INodes, I decided to just get things to compile.  I think those CP's that didn't have "node" words pre DigitalSubject->Node may have fared better in this change.  However I did notice there were still some old occurrences of "subject" and "digitalSubject" floating around from the last change.

That said, if you (or any other CP writer) would like me to do a more thorough job of switching variables, args, and javadoc comments around, I can.

Jim

>>> "Daniel Sanders" <dsanders@xxxxxxxxxx> 04/30/08 9:20 AM >>>

Jim,

 

I noticed lots of places in the xmlfile CP provider where the "Node" in variable names and function names should be changed to "Entity".  Perhaps I should take a crack at it after you get the minimal changes needed to get it all compiling.  What do you think?

 

Daniel

>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/30/2008 3:43 AM >>>

attached are the diffs for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222143

let me know if there's something wrong or missing.

Jim

p.s. it's no fun distinguishing between our "nodes" and other "nodes" while renaming.