| RE: [higgins-dev] Two different F2F meetings |
|
I was proposing postponing the Jan F2F 1 week for both reasons. Both to accommodate those who can't travel on the week of the 7th, as well as making it easier to combine the Dec multi-protocol meeting with the Jan F2F. Brian, I think you misunderstood Tony. He was talking about postponing the Jan 8-10 Provo F2F until the week of Jan 14th. I _ think _ there remain enough folks interested in having an _ interim
_ Dec 17/18 New York meeting focused on multi-protocol support, SAML, etc. to have one.
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent:
Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:09 PM To:
Subject:
RE: [higgins-dev]
+1 Moving the meeting to January might allow me to attend in person.
Brian
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jim Sermersheim Sent:
Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:36 PM To:
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc:
' Subject:
RE: [higgins-dev]
Would it be better to move it to Jan 14-17? That would give us more time after the new year to get our thoughts together anyway.
Some of us may not be able to make the January meeting if its in the first full week in January.
>>> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/27/07 7:12 AM >>>
Daniel,
The meeting in December in NY is not a regular F2F in the traditional sense, but rather is a focused discussion on a particular technical area that currently needs resolution. After the initial dev announcement of the new SAML2 IdP protocol prototype, it was discussed in the weekly call format, but deeper conversations are needed. Sometimes we deal with issues like this as a separate call, but this was deep enough that a face-to-face meeting was a better vehicle. I'm sure that we will talk about this more in January.
Mike, is it possible to have a dial-in line for this session?
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders
Monday, November 26, 2007 7:18 PM
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
ari.kermaier@xxxxxxxxxx; AMSI.MOTUKURU@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: [higgins-dev]
Mary,
Can you explain why we are scheduling a 2nd F2F so close to the one in January? Is there no time in January to cover these topics? Could they be repeated in January?
I have a high interest in these topics, but I'm not sure I can get out to NY on those dates. I'm sure you've got good reasons, but I don't recall seeing much prior discussion about holding a 2nd F2F on the mailing list. Was it discussed during some of the calls? ... Unfortunately, I haven't been able to join all of the calls lately... is that where all of this was discussed?
Thanks,
Daniel
>>> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/21/2007 12:10 PM >>>
The new
IBM has graciously agreed to host the meeting at their
We are expecting the meeting to last one and a half to two days.
Straw man agenda:
·
1/2 day on general
·
1/2 day on STS architecture
·
1/2 day on SAML binding and Token
E
xtensions.
·
W
orking session
Let us know if you can attend on the 17th and 18th, and if you have any suggestions for the agenda. December 19th and 20th are also possible dates. Then we will confirm the date/time. A link to the draft agenda and logistics can be found on the
-Mary _______________________________________________
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
**********************************************************************
|
Sermersheim? Jim>"Jim Sermersheim" ---11/28/2007 10:59:02 AM---We were hoping for a video conference since calling in doesn't lend itself very well to looking at whiteboard drawings. It loo
