Re: [higgins-dev] IdASRegistry as Singleton?

[Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Can we reach consensus on this quickly and start the clock on the 
interface change notice period ASAP?

Thanks,
Mike

higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/22/2007 08:24:39 PM:

> I agree.  And beyond this, we've been thinking that it should also 
> produce ContextFactories as singleton's as well.  In respect to our 
> ongoing registry discussions, it would actually hold a map where the
> key is an identifier (which represents a factory+factoryConfig), and
> the value would be the factory.
> 
> Also, I wonder if this class should even be called a "registry".  It
> feels more like a factory producer to me.
> 
> Jim
> 
> >>> Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx> 2/22/07 6:14 PM >>>
> Can we make the IdASRegistry a singleton by creating a getInstance 
method?
> Can anyone think of any reason why we'd want more than one IdASRegistry 
> instance?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev