[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [higgins-dev] Does higgins.owl need to show the tie betweenSubjectRelationship and DigitalSubject
|
Good point. I noticed that today too and added just what you have below
(except subjectRelationship is now relationship).
Fixed:
See http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl
and http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Higgins_Ontology
-Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Sermersheim
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:32 PM
> To: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [higgins-dev] Does higgins.owl need to show the tie
> betweenSubjectRelationship and DigitalSubject
>
> In reviewing the analogies between IdAS and higgins.owl, I noticed
> higgins.owl seems to be missing something like this:
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="subjectRelationship">
> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#DigitalSubject"/>
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#SubjectRelationship"/>
> </owl:ObjectProperty>
>
> Don't we need this? If not, I'm confused.
>
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
