[higgins-dev] Does higgins.owl need to show the tie between SubjectRelat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[higgins-dev] Does higgins.owl need to show the tie between SubjectRelationship and DigitalSubject

From: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:31:56 -0600
Delivered-to: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/higgins-dev>
List-help: <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>, <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>, <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In reviewing the analogies between IdAS and higgins.owl, I noticed higgins.owl seems to be missing something like this:
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="subjectRelationship"> 
   <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#DigitalSubject"/> 
   <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#SubjectRelationship"/> 
</owl:ObjectProperty>

Don't we need this? If not, I'm confused. 

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [higgins-dev] Does higgins.owl need to show the tie betweenSubjectRelationship and DigitalSubject
  - From: Paul Trevithick

References:
- [higgins-dev] Person "with" Example
  - From: Tom Doman
- Re: [higgins-dev] Person "with" Example
  - From: Tom Doman
- [higgins-dev] more filter assertions or less digital subject
  - From: Jim Sermersheim

Prev by Date: [higgins-dev] more filter assertions or less digital subject
Next by Date: [higgins-dev] Relationships
Previous by thread: [higgins-dev] more filter assertions or less digital subject
Next by thread: RE: [higgins-dev] Does higgins.owl need to show the tie betweenSubjectRelationship and DigitalSubject
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs