Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] Proposed Version 1: Higgins based LDAP OWL ontology

Tom wrote:
> 
> Besides the two small items I mentioned earlier, there is one additional
> reason the attached ontology is not OWL-DL, namely, no
> "&higgins;integerSimpleValue".  I believe Paul's adding definitions for at
> least the basic types soon.
> 
I added integerSimpleValue, I'll add the rest real soon.
http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl 

-Paul



Back to the top