Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] Proposed Version 1: Higgins based LDAP OWL ontology

So is the intent for this to become part of Higgins ? or is this something that Higgins would have to pick up from Bandit ?

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Inactive hide details for "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>"Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>


          "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>
          Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

          09/29/2006 03:49 PM

          Please respond to
          "Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Mark.Wahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

cc


Subject

[higgins-dev] Proposed Version 1: Higgins based LDAP OWL ontology

Attached is what we (Jim and I) are proposing a Higgins based LDAP OWL ontology would look like.  At least, we believe this is complete enough to call "version 1".  Again, this is generated OWL from our Bandit Higgins LDAP Context Provider.  Please review and provide any feedback you have.  Jim and I have come to agreement and hopefully this is in line with "Person" example Paul is coming out with today.  If not, we'll tweak it accordingly.

The biggest change between this and any previous version (ie. testLDAP.owl) you may have seen is the inclusion of Datatype properties that represent LDAP syntaxes and their subsequent linkage with attributes.  Currently, they all end up being simple data types but this work will allow us to create complex data types for either LDAP context specific or Higgins common complex types.  It also causes the LDAP syntaxes used for each attribute value to be explicitly called out.  SemanticWorks provides a nice graphical view of what we've defined.

Besides the two small items I mentioned earlier, there is one additional reason the attached ontology is not OWL-DL, namely, no "&higgins;integerSimpleValue".  I believe Paul's adding definitions for at least the basic types soon.

I'll wait for a little feedback from Higgins participants and then I'll propose this to the Identity Schemas group for them to tear apart.

Tom Doman
Novell Inc.

(See attached file: genHigginsLDAP0.1.0.owl)_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image

Attachment: genHigginsLDAP0.1.0.owl
Description: Binary data

Back to the top