RE: [higgins-dev] Higgins Dev Call 7/27/2006, noon ET

["Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Also attended: Valery Kokhan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Trevithick
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:09 PM
> To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
> Subject: [higgins-dev] Higgins Dev Call 7/27/2006, noon ET
> 
> Attended: Tom, Jim, Duane, Greg, Brian, Tony, Mike, Paul, Mary
> 
> Agenda
> ------
> STS licensing
> Chuck Mortimer code conversion
> Face-to-face meeting in Raleigh
>  - focus on ISS
> IdAS design questions
>  - provider vs. factory discussion from recent threads
>  - http://spwiki.editme.com/ContextRef open issues
>  - filter language
> 
> 
> STS licensing update
> --------------------
> - Tony: we're getting closer, should be done Friday or Monday
> - We've already given royalty free licenses for the spex themselves
> - The part we're working on is the idemix technology
> 
> STS Architecture
> ----------------
> - Paul: MikeM has just published this diagram:
> http://spwiki.editme.com/SecurityTokenService
> - Tony: we've been working on the architecture, will continue for a few
> more
> weeks
> - Brian: this is great news
> - Tony: Brian please look this over and give us some feedback
> 
> IDAS
> ----
> - We discussed the term: context provider vs. factory. Our conclusion was
> to
> use "ContextFactory".
> - Jim's suggestion: have 'open' (and 'close') on the Context itself
> - Greg will update this wiki page:
> http://spwiki.editme.com/ContextProvider
> and this wiki page: http://spwiki.editme.com/ContextProviderRegistry
> - Tom is going to ping Tony about his mention of using WS-Policy together
> with XACML
> - Paul: Greg has suggested SPARQL as the filter query language?
> - Paul: concern about the burden to developers to implement a full SPARQL
> interpreter
> - Greg: a new thought: maybe the query language should be provider-
> specific
> - Jim: hmm.. the consumer wants to be provider-agnostic
> - Jim: here is the std Higgins filter, but any provider could provide
> another interface class
> - Jim: somebody could research the components of SPARQL to understand how
> hard this is for providers to support. Given Higgins.owl, mockup a Context
> that has some Digital Subjects in it and mockup some queries against it so
> we can all see how it looks
> 
> Face-to-face
> ------------
> - 23-25 of August in Raleigh 1pm start on 23, 1pm end on fri 25th
> - IBM, Novell, Sun, Microsoft, Oracle
> - ISS component is the focus
> - Paul: we need to add a rich client Identity Selector to the architecture
> diagram, also Microsoft has explained that many (most?) CardSpace relying
> parties will delegate to an STS (using WS-MEX) to provide the list of
> required claims to the ISS (in addition to the parsing of HTML object tag
> params that we've already implemented).
> 
> Other topics?
> -------------
> - Jim: Mentioned another IDAS open issue: how does one do a re-
> authenticate
> (efficiently)
> - Paul: Raj has suggested that this is an implementation detail, you just
> call 'open' again
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev