Re: [gmf-dev] Bundles and CQs for GMF

[Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wayne,

Here is the full story:

When we delivered GMF 1.0 in Callisto
in June 2006, we delivered Batik 1.6 in one bundle in GMF. This is CQ 208.
The Batik libraries include (repackage) some other apache libraries.

Then the next year in June 2007 for
Europa, we moved the Batik 1.6 libraries into orbit. We did raise new CQ
2070.

For the next four releases we continued
to stick on Batik 1.6. We never raised any new CQ as we still only depended
in Batik 1.6. 

We shipped org.apache.xml.resolver 1.1
in Europa, but now we are at org.apache.xml.resolver 1.2 in Indigo. I do
not know when the switch from version 1.1 to 1.2 occurred. This was simply
because our build was taking the latest version of the library that happened
to be in Orbit. I think you are telling me this makes a difference. My
build just says use version 1.x from Orbit and my build gets the latest.

I can get you the versions of the libraries,
but for Europa we shipped org.apache.xml.resolver 1.1.0.v200705310020.


For more information, we also did make
an attempt to use Batik 1.7, and raised a bunch of CQ for this as well,
but this was a big fail and the work did not complete, mainly because Batik
1.7 is a breaking release with incompatible changes. We never shipped on
Batik 1.7.

p.s. hope you do not mind me copying
gmf-dev so everyone is aware of this issue.

Cheers...
Anthony




From:      
 Wayne Beaton <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 Anthony Hunter/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Date:      
 03/21/2011 07:30 PM
Subject:    
   Re: Bundles
and CQs for GMF

---

Thanks Anthony.

However, you do seem to be providing downloads of versions for which I
cannot find CQs. Per our IP Policy, you are required to have  CQ for
everything you distribute. Either we need to identify a CQ for each of
the libraries I listed, or remove them from the download server.

For example, I am aware that resolver 1.2 is included in Batik 1.6. You
are distributing this version, but are also distributing version 1.1 in
the directories I mentioned below. Could this be an artefact from an old
build gone wrong?

Thanks,

Wayne

On 03/21/2011 03:34 PM, Anthony Hunter wrote:
> We use in the following versions for GMF-Runtime in Indigo
> 
> org.apache.xml.resolver 1.2.0
> org.w3c.dom.smil 0.0.0
> org.w3c.dom.events 0.0.0
> org.w3c.dom.svg 0.0.0
> org.w3c.css.sac 1.3.1
> 
> All of these come from the Batik 1.6 (CQ 208) .
> 
> 0.0.0 means we do not have a hard coded version in the feature.xml
> 
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:         Wayne Beaton <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:         Anthony Hunter/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
> Date:         03/21/2011 02:15 AM
> Subject:         Bundles and CQs for GMF
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Anthony.
> 
> I am reviewing the IP for the EEP project. EEP consumes EPF which
in
> turn consumes GMF-*.
> 
> While doing my review, I found a couple of bundles being distributed
by
> GMP/GMF-* on download.eclipse.org that I can't find a CQ for. Can
you
> take a look and let me know where these come from?
> 
>                    
             org.apache.xml.resolver_1.1.0.*.jar
>                    
             org.w3c.dom.smil.source_1.0.0.*.jar
>                    
             org.w3c.dom.smil_1.0.0.*.jar
>                    
             org.w3c.dom_1.3.3.*.jar
>                    
             org.w3c.css.sac.source_1.3.1.*.jar
>                    
             org.w3c.css.sac_1.3.1.*.jar
> 
> These files are found in:
> 
> /modeling/gmp/updates/releases/plugins
> /modeling/gmp/updates/plugins
> /modeling/gmp/update-site/releases/plugins
> /modeling/gmp/update-site/europa/plugins
> 
> Resolver may require that you create a piggyback off CQ87. Or might
this
> come from a version of Batik? AFAIK, Batik 1.6 (CQ 208) includes
> Resolver *1.2*. Similarly, there are different versions of smil, dom,
> and css associated with Batik 1.6.
> 
> Can you help me sort out what's going on here?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Wayne
>