[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
|
Since some of the Bugzillas are ones we moved from 1.0 to 2.0, I am more
inclined to move all open on 2.0 to "---" and add a comment:
"Did not make 2.0, moving to a future release. Originator should comment or
change the priority if the request is critical in nature".
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037
From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 19/06/2007 07:32 AM
Subject Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
:
I added 2.0.1 and 2.0.2
The 'future' milestone is usually indicated with '---'. I'm not sure what
other kind of milestone we could set, or if we even should. Ideas?
- Rich
On 6/19/07 5:22 AM, "Artem Tikhomirov" <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I suggest we add 2.0.x target milestones to Bugzilla and perhaps some
kind of
> 'future' milestone to denote requests that are not planned for next
release
> but helpwanted/may be considered later. Bulk move to 2.1 is easy but not
that
> sensible ;)
>
> Artem
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
>> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:57 PM
>> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
>> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>>
>> Let's all try to cleanup Bugzilla, then we'll have a clear
>> view of what's left. I'm traveling this evening, but will
>> try to sync Deskzilla and run through all those still in 2.0/RCM7.
>>
>> Sure, if you have some for 2.0 you'd like to discuss on the
>> call tomorrow, please list on the wiki. If there are none
>> listed, we'll know not to dial in.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> On 6/18/07 8:58 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe we should list the Bugzillas we plan to do for the release?
>>> Should we do this today?
>>>
>>> Cheers...
>>> Anthony
>>> --
>>> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx Software Development
>>> Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components IBM Rational
>> Software: Aurora
>>> / Modeling Tools
>>> Phone: 613-591-7037
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> To: "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Date: 18/06/2007 06:52 AM
>>>
>>> Subject [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>>> :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there anything to discuss this time, or are we all set
>> to build 2.0?
>>>
>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Dev_Calls
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rich
>>> --
>>> Richard C. Gronback
>>> Borland Software Corporation
>>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>
>> --
>> Richard C. Gronback
>> Borland Software Corporation
>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> +1 860 227 9215
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmf-dev mailing list
>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
