[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
|
'---' is not very handy - newly submitted requests get it by default and it's just inconvenient to see both 'later' and 'not yet processed' in the same list.
Artem
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 1:31 PM
> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>
> I added 2.0.1 and 2.0.2
>
> The 'future' milestone is usually indicated with '---'. I'm
> not sure what other kind of milestone we could set, or if we
> even should. Ideas?
>
> - Rich
>
>
> On 6/19/07 5:22 AM, "Artem Tikhomirov"
> <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I suggest we add 2.0.x target milestones to Bugzilla and
> perhaps some
> > kind of 'future' milestone to denote requests that are not
> planned for
> > next release but helpwanted/may be considered later. Bulk
> move to 2.1
> > is easy but not that sensible ;)
> >
> > Artem
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
> >> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:57 PM
> >> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
> >> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> >>
> >> Let's all try to cleanup Bugzilla, then we'll have a clear view of
> >> what's left. I'm traveling this evening, but will try to sync
> >> Deskzilla and run through all those still in 2.0/RCM7.
> >>
> >> Sure, if you have some for 2.0 you'd like to discuss on the call
> >> tomorrow, please list on the wiki. If there are none
> listed, we'll
> >> know not to dial in.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rich
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/18/07 8:58 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maybe we should list the Bugzillas we plan to do for the release?
> >>> Should we do this today?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers...
> >>> Anthony
> >>> --
> >>> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx Software Development
> >>> Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components IBM Rational
> >> Software: Aurora
> >>> / Modeling Tools
> >>> Phone: 613-591-7037
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> To: "GMF Project developer discussions."
> <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Date: 18/06/2007 06:52 AM
> >>>
> >>> Subject [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is there anything to discuss this time, or are we all set
> >> to build 2.0?
> >>>
> >>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Dev_Calls
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Rich
> >>> --
> >>> Richard C. Gronback
> >>> Borland Software Corporation
> >>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
> >>> gmf-dev mailing list
> >>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gmf-dev mailing list
> >>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>
> >> --
> >> Richard C. Gronback
> >> Borland Software Corporation
> >> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +1 860 227 9215
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gmf-dev mailing list
> >> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmf-dev mailing list
> > gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
> --
> Richard C. Gronback
> Borland Software Corporation
> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 860 227 9215
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
