Re: [gmf-dev] Build I20060227-1730 posted

[Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Richard,

Currently: 
Eclipse declares a new Integration build
for the week we adopt the latest integration builds for Eclipse + EMF +
GEF + EMFT (not 100% sure which day this is done, but I think it is Thursday).
Once we have a working / approved GMF
integration build we move these targets back to the nightly builds and
developers adopt as their new target.

I think we want to switch to the nightly
build and developers running on a target for a week before using them for
the GMF integration builds. This way we have a period of time to test and
fix JUnit failures. 

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer, 
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/27/2006 06:58 PM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	<gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	[gmf-dev] Build I20060227-1730 posted

http://download.eclipse.org/technology/gmf/downloads/drops/I-I20060227-200602271730/index.php
 
Note the updated dependencies (Platform 3.2M5a,
EMF/GEF/EMFT M5) and some test failures.
 
Are we OK to switch back to stable configurations
for nightly builds, or should we stick with weekly updates to the latest
I-build in our dev environments?
 
Also, a new Linux build machine is being
configured in Prague and will be managed by Max Feldman, who returns to
GMF after a period away.  This should eliminate our connection timeout
errors and path limit problems.
 
Thanks,
Rich_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev