vramaswa@xxxxxxxxxx for me
*Daniel Leroux/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA*
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/26/2005 07:46 AM
Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
To
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
dleroux@xxxxxxxxxxxx for me.
Dan
*"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/26/05 06:56 AM
Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
To
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
No objection, if it’s what you have available.
- Rich (_gronback@acm.org_ <mailto:gronback@xxxxxxx> on MSN)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
From:* gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Frederic Plante*
Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:32 PM*
To:* GMF Project developer discussions.*
Subject:* Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
The use of Windows Messenger for instant messaging among the GMF team
would be a possible option for IBM employees. Any objection?
Thanks
- Fred
_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada
tel: (613) 591-7034
*Daniel Leroux/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA*
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/24/2005 01:09 PM
Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
To
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
Unfortunately, I checked into it after the kickoff meeting and Skype
isn't an option that is available to IBM employees...
Thanks,
Dan
*Karsten Ehrig <karstene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/24/05 12:17 PM
Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
To
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
Hi Dan and others,
congratulations to your nice prototype of the DSM Toolkit.
By the way: what does "DSM" mean. I would propose to take a more simple
name like "Designer".
What I expect before going into the real implementation phase of the
Designer is to have
a discussion about the general requirements in the GMF group.
Perhaps the GMF community could also profit from some ideals of the
Tiger Designer.
I would also expect that the GMF Designer uses the Borland GMF code
generator,
so maybe the Designer could be joined work of the GMF community.
By the way: could we use Skype for the next presentation/discussion as
proposed in the kickoff meeting?
Regards,
Karsten
Daniel Leroux wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing an update on where the existing codebase
> has evolved.
>
> The work done by the students is definitely a prototype and requires a
> lot more work but it exceeded all my expectations of what could be
> done in < 10 weeks. They probably also exceeded our GMF M1 goals and
> would definitely give the project a huge headstart...which is why I
> pushed to have this presented to all of you. Over time we could
> replace it with a generated editor but I see significant short-term
> benefits to releasing this code to the community.
> - We have nice/usable UI for M1
> - There is (potentially long-term) value in the patterns (templates)
> that the students developed to generate the right code that leverages
> the runtime in the right way...this potentially helps the Borland
> developers get up to speed on the runtime more quickly(??)
>
> Look forward to discussing this with everyone.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> *"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 08/23/05 10:10 PM
> Please respond to
> "GMF Project developer discussions."
>
>
>
> To
> <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks again to Fred and team for taking the time to show us the DSM
> Toolkit. Clearly, some nice work by a small group of students in a
> short period of time!
>
> I'd like to get some feedback on this proposed contribution from the
> group. Although it would quickly add some polish to the project, it
> does so at the loss of having bootstrapped of our own editors (a
> stated goal of the project). I'd like to see how our existing
> codebase progresses toward this goal and have a follow-up call to
> discuss this matter, our build/test process, the runtime refactoring,
> and the EMFT contributions. Also, I'd like to cover some topics
> raised during the Council meetings taking place in Boston this week
> (IP issues, the release train, etc.)
>
> Thanks again to the IBM team.
>
> Best Regards,
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>gmf-dev mailing list
>gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
