| RE: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo |
-----Original Message-----
From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frederic Plante
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 9:50 AM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
Mine is fplante@xxxxxxxxxx
Doychin Bondzhev <doychin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx08/26/2005 09:21 AM
"GMF Project developer discussions."
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
my MSN account is doychin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Doychin Bondzhev
Frederic Plante wrote:
>
> The use of Windows Messenger for instant messaging among the GMF team
> would be a possible option for IBM employees. Any objection?
>
> Thanks
>
> - Fred
>
> _________________________________
> Frйdйric Plante
> Rational Software, IBM Software Group
> 770 Palladium Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada
> tel: (613) 591-7034
>
>
>
>
> *Daniel Leroux/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA*
> Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 08/24/2005 01:09 PM
> Please respond to
> "GMF Project developer discussions."
>
>
>
> To
> "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, I checked into it after the kickoff meeting and Skype
> isn't an option that is available to IBM employees...
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> *Karsten Ehrig <karstene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 08/24/05 12:17 PM
> Please respond to
> "GMF Project developer discussions."
>
>
> To
> "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Dan and others,
>
> congratulations to your nice prototype of the DSM Toolkit.
> By the way: what does "DSM" mean. I would propose to take a more simple
> name like "Designer".
> What I expect before going into the real implementation phase of the
> Designer is to have
> a discussion about the general requirements in the GMF group.
> Perhaps the GMF community could also profit from some ideals of the
> Tiger Designer.
> I would also expect that the GMF Designer uses the Borland GMF code
> generator,
> so maybe the Designer could be joined work of the GMF community.
>
> By the way: could we use Skype for the next presentation/discussion as
> proposed in the kickoff meeting?
>
> Regards,
> Karsten
>
>
> Daniel Leroux wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > I'm looking forward to seeing an update on where the existing codebase
> > has evolved.
> >
> > The work done by the students is definitely a prototype and requires a
> > lot more work but it exceeded all my expectations of what could be
> > done in < 10 weeks. They probably also exceeded our GMF M1 goals and
> > would definitely give the project a huge headstart...which is why I
> > pushed to have this presented to all of you. Over time we could
> > replace it with a generated editor but I see significant short-term
> > benefits to releasing this code to the community.
> > - We have nice/usable UI for M1
> > - There is (potentially long-term) value in the patterns (templates)
> > that the students developed to generate the right code that leverages
> > the runtime in the right way...this potentially helps the Borland
> > developers get up to speed on the runtime more quickly(??)
> >
> > Look forward to discussing this with everyone.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
> > Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > 08/23/05 10:10 PM
> > Please respond to
> > "GMF Project developer discussions."
> >
> >
> >
> > To
> > <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > [gmf-dev] IBM's DSM Toolkit demo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thanks again to Fred and team for taking the time to show us the DSM
> > Toolkit. Clearly, some nice work by a small group of students in a
> > short period of time!
> >
> > I'd like to get some feedback on this proposed contribution from the
> > group. Although it would quickly add some polish to the project, it
> > does so at the loss of having bootstrapped of our own editors (a
> > stated goal of the project). I'd like to see how our existing
> > codebase progresses toward this goal and have a follow-up call to
> > discuss this matter, our build/test process, the runtime refactoring,
> > and the EMFT contributions. Also, I'd like to cover some topics
> > raised during the Council meetings taking place in Boston this week
> > (IP issues, the release train, etc.)
> >
> > Thanks again to the IBM team.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Richard
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmf-dev mailing list
> > gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >gmf-dev mailing list
> >gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev