[gemini-dev] Maven artifact IDs

[Les Hazlewood <les@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

I'm looking through blueprint's source code as an example of some best practices for developing my own OSGi bundles.  I notice that the project's Maven artifactId's are fairly standard for general Maven use in that they use the name-name2-name3 convention (with dashes).

But is not the convention for Maven-created OSGi bundles to have the artifactId be the same as the Bundle-SymbolicName?

I've noticed almost all of the Spring EBR bundles are like this.  I'm just wondering if 1) I should do the same in my own project and 2) if this is a fairly standard convention, does the Gemini Blueprint project have plans to switch to that?

Any thoughts and/or recommendations?

Thanks,

Les