Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: AW: [geclipse-user] Re: LFC problem

Hi All,

Thanks for your effort and I will be happy if I can plan my re-evaluation of gEclipse.

Good luck to find the bug.

Gérald

On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 08:28 +0200, Harald Kornmayer wrote:
Hi Mateusz

Can you come up with an realistic estimation for a deadline.
When can the problem be solved?
Do you need more informatino from Gerald?

Harald


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: geclipse-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:geclipse-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mateusz Pabis'
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:14 PM
>>To: g-Eclipse User discussions
>>Subject: Re: AW: [geclipse-user] Re: LFC problem
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm currently working on that. Since I have quite lot of work
>>to do it's going slowly. Sorry for the delay.
>>
>>Sorry, my previous answer went to Mathias only.
>>
>>-- Mateusz Pabis
>>
>>Stuempert, Mathias IWR pisze:
>>> Dear Gerald,
>>>
>>> First, you seem to be a brave guy, trying again and again
>>to kick asses at the g-Eclipse end ;-) Thanks for not giving up!
>>>
>>> Second, well, I thought we had a commitment from our
>>LFC-developer(s) to take care about your problem.
>>Unfortunately it seems that I was wrong here.
>>>
>>> So can we please have a definite statement guys. Who is
>>taking care of this and what is the schedule?! When will
>>these issues be fixed? Or should I take care by myself though
>>I have no clue about our LFC implementation? I would have
>>been definitely faster if I would have taken care before!
>>Sorry, but this is really lame!
>>>
>>> Cheers, Mathias
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Gerald Vetois [mailto:gerald.vetois@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Gesendet: Mi 24.06.2009 10:05
>>> An: g-Eclipse User discussions
>>> Cc: Stuempert, Mathias IWR; Mateusz Pabis
>>> Betreff: Re: [geclipse-user] Re: LFC problem
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I contacted you about a LFC problem 2 month ago. And I
>>didn't have any
>>> news.
>>> Could you please tell me when you plan to try to solve this problem
>>> because I would like to promote g-Eclipse in our VO.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your response.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>     Gérald
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:04 +0200, Gerald Vetois wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Have you progress on my problem with LFC ?
>>>>
>>>> In other way, we promoted geclipse during the "third EGEODE days"
>>>> with this following presentation ( in french but there is a lot of
>>>> screen-shot )
>>>>
>>http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?sessionId=7&materialId=1&con
>>>> fId=55798
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>    Gérald
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:24 +0200, Gerald Vetois wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi ,
>>>>>
>>>>> Great, it's a good news if you can reproduce the error.
>>If you need
>>>>> something to help you to fix the bug you can ask me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for help.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Gérald
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 10:21 +0200, Mateusz Pabis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I received your email.
>>>>>> I was able to reproduce this error, but I have no idea
>>what's wrong
>>>>>> right now. I haven't time to look at it since I was on the
>>>>>> BalticGrid Meeting for last few days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll look at it today afternoon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gerald Vetois pisze:
>>>>>>> Hi Mateusz,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you receive my answers to your questions ?
>>>>>>> And do you find any clue to solve my problem ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in for advance for your reply and your help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Gérald
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Mateusz ,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At first I would like to know where it failed. Is it during
>>>>>>>>> writing or retrieving information.
>>>>>>>> I make a copy action from the lfc directory and I make a paste
>>>>>>>> action in a local directory.
>>>>>>>> The complete action doesn't give any error but when I
>>check the
>>>>>>>> file size, it's equal to 0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I assume that when the file is downloaded with SRM
>>it's non-zero, right?
>>>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you please check in Properties View (ctrl+3, type:
>>>>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>>> view) in replica section is there server information in field
>>>>>>>> "Replica 1"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> please find in attached file the properties of the lfc file.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See you,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Gérald
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 15:22 +0200, Mateusz Pabis wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to evaluate gEclipse for our EGEE VO user
>>( egeode VO
>>>>>>>>> :http://www.egeode.org  ).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At the moment, g-Eclipse is very good tools for us
>>but I have a
>>>>>>>>> problem with LFC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Therefore I would like to submit to you my problem of
>>my LFC usage.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can browse a LFC directory ( but not all directory
>>) and I can
>>>>>>>>> upload or download file but when I download all files
>>size are
>>>>>>>>> 0.  It's strange because with SRM protocol, the
>>download is OK
>>>>>>>>> but It's not acceptable for the user.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you know this kind of problem ? and if yes, could
>>you please
>>>>>>>>> give me how can I solve this problem and I think it's
>>possible
>>>>>>>>> because it mentions LFC works in this link :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>http://www.g-eclipse.eu/documentation/index.jsp?topic=/eu.geclip
>>>>>>>>> se.doc.user/html/whats_new.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> g-Eclipse 1.0 M6
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     * First implementation of LFC filesystem is ready. Both
>>>>>>>>> reading and writing is possible
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your help.
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your interesting in our application.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To figure out where the problem is, I would like to
>>know more details.
>>>>>>>> At first I would like to know where it failed. Is it during
>>>>>>>> writing or retrieving information.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I assume that when the file is downloaded with SRM
>>it's non-zero, right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you please check in Properties View (ctrl+3, type:
>>>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>> view) in replica section is there server information
>>in field "Replica 1"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> Mateusz Pabis
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> geclipse-user mailing list
>>>>>>>> geclipse-user@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geclipse-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-user
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> ------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>geclipse-user mailing list
>>geclipse-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-user

_______________________________________________
geclipse-user mailing list
geclipse-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-user


Back to the top