Re: AW: [geclipse-user] Re: LFC problem

[Mateusz Pabis' <uranium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I'm currently working on that. Since I have quite lot of work to do it's
going slowly. Sorry for the delay.

Sorry, my previous answer went to Mathias only.

-- Mateusz Pabis

Stuempert, Mathias IWR pisze:
> Dear Gerald,
> 
> First, you seem to be a brave guy, trying again and again to kick asses at the g-Eclipse end ;-) Thanks for not giving up!
> 
> Second, well, I thought we had a commitment from our LFC-developer(s) to take care about your problem. Unfortunately it seems that I was wrong here.
> 
> So can we please have a definite statement guys. Who is taking care of this and what is the schedule?! When will these issues be fixed? Or should I take care by myself though I have no clue about our LFC implementation? I would have been definitely faster if I would have taken care before! Sorry, but this is really lame!
> 
> Cheers, Mathias
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Gerald Vetois [mailto:gerald.vetois@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Mi 24.06.2009 10:05
> An: g-Eclipse User discussions
> Cc: Stuempert, Mathias IWR; Mateusz Pabis
> Betreff: Re: [geclipse-user] Re: LFC problem
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> I contacted you about a LFC problem 2 month ago. And I didn't have any
> news.
> Could you please tell me when you plan to try to solve this problem
> because I would like to promote g-Eclipse in our VO.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your response.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>     Gérald
> 
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:04 +0200, Gerald Vetois wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Have you progress on my problem with LFC ? 
>>
>> In other way, we promoted geclipse during the "third EGEODE days" with
>> this following presentation ( in french but there is a lot of
>> screen-shot ) 
>> http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?sessionId=7&materialId=1&confId=55798
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    Gérald
>>
>> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:24 +0200, Gerald Vetois wrote:
>>
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>> Great, it's a good news if you can reproduce the error. If you need
>>> something to help you to fix the bug you can ask me.
>>>
>>> Thanks for help.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>>     Gérald
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 10:21 +0200, Mateusz Pabis wrote: 
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I received your email.
>>>> I was able to reproduce this error, but I have no idea what's wrong
>>>> right now. I haven't time to look at it since I was on the BalticGrid
>>>> Meeting for last few days.
>>>>
>>>> I'll look at it today afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>> Gerald Vetois pisze:
>>>>> Hi Mateusz,
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you receive my answers to your questions ?
>>>>> And do you find any clue to solve my problem ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in for advance for your reply and your help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Gérald
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Mateusz ,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At first I would like to know where it failed. Is it during writing or
>>>>>>> retrieving information.
>>>>>> I make a copy action from the lfc directory and I make a paste action
>>>>>> in a local directory.
>>>>>> The complete action doesn't give any error but when I check the file
>>>>>> size, it's equal to 0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I assume that when the file is downloaded with SRM it's non-zero, right?
>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you please check in Properties View (ctrl+3, type: properties
>>>>>>> view) in replica section is there server information in field
>>>>>> "Replica 1"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please find in attached file the properties of the lfc file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Gérald
>>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 15:22 +0200, Mateusz Pabis wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm trying to evaluate gEclipse for our EGEE VO user ( egeode VO
>>>>>>> :http://www.egeode.org  ).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the moment, g-Eclipse is very good tools for us but I have a problem
>>>>>>> with LFC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Therefore I would like to submit to you my problem of my LFC usage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can browse a LFC directory ( but not all directory ) and I can upload
>>>>>>> or download file but when I download all files size are 0.  It's strange
>>>>>>> because with SRM protocol, the download is OK but It's not acceptable
>>>>>>> for the user.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you know this kind of problem ? and if yes, could you please give me
>>>>>>> how can I solve this problem and I think it's possible because it
>>>>>>> mentions LFC works in this link :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.g-eclipse.eu/documentation/index.jsp?topic=/eu.geclipse.doc.user/html/whats_new.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> g-Eclipse 1.0 M6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     * First implementation of LFC filesystem is ready. Both reading and
>>>>>>> writing is possible
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your help.
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your interesting in our application.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To figure out where the problem is, I would like to know more details.
>>>>>> At first I would like to know where it failed. Is it during writing or
>>>>>> retrieving information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume that when the file is downloaded with SRM it's non-zero, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please check in Properties View (ctrl+3, type: properties
>>>>>> view) in replica section is there server information in field "Replica 1"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Mateusz Pabis
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> geclipse-user mailing list
>>>>>> geclipse-user@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geclipse-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-user
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>