On Wednesday 07 October 2009 12:04:48 Lauzanne Philippe wrote:
> hi,
>
> In order to separate your work on TraceViewer from mine, I am extending the
> classes of Trace Viewer, but some classes (LogicalMouseGraphAdapter,
> PhysicalMouseGraphAdapter, DropDown and nearly every classes in the OTF
> reader) are private. I would like to know if there is another way to extend
> thoses classes and if there is not, why is it private ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Philippe
>
> 2009/10/6 Lauzanne Philippe <
lauzanne.philippe@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > hi,
> >
> > I had to ask to my superiors about sharing the program. The project seems
> > to be open source, so there won't be any problem !
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> > 2009/9/16 Stuempert, Mathias IWR <
mathias.stuempert@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> >> Just one further comment. As Thomas already mentioned we as an Eclipse
> >> project are always interested in contributions from others. So if you
> >> are going to do some work for yourself on the traceviewer it would
> >> really be a shame to not contribute this work to the project itself. We
> >> both would benefit from your contributions. So please think about
> >> sharing your work with us and other users and let us know if you decide
> >> to do so.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Mathias
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von:
geclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx im Auftrag von Lauzanne Philippe
> >> Gesendet: Mi 16.09.2009 10:22
> >> An: Developer mailing list
> >> Betreff: Re: [geclipse-dev] Trace Viewer sources and releases
> >>
> >> Thank you for your fast answer and the patch, Thomas !
> >> I will use the version from the trunk then.
> >>
> >> Philippe
> >>
> >> 2009/9/15 Thomas Köckerbauer <
tkoeck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> > Hello
> >> >
> >> > > I am currently working on a OTF trace viewer eclipse plug-in focused
> >>
> >> of
> >>
> >> > > interactions between components (as defined by UML). I tested Trace
> >> >
> >> > Viewer
> >> >
> >> > > included in the g-eclipse RPC and I would like to use it as a
> >>
> >> beginning
> >>
> >> > for
> >> >
> >> > > my project. I only found the sources on the eclipse SVN, but there
> >> > > are quite a lot of TODOs and some bug fixes are still to be done.
> >> >
> >> > Most of the TODOs in the source are because of auto-generated code
> >>
> >> (mainly
> >>
> >> > exception handling for parts where it is not critical), the current
> >>
> >> version
> >>
> >> > should be quite stable.
> >> >
> >> > One TODO regarding OTF support that might be relevant for you is that
> >> > currently the trace viewer code in the SVN uses the java zlib
> >>
> >> compression
> >>
> >> > support, which is broken (i.e. it can not open some compressed OTF
> >>
> >> files).
> >>
> >> > There is a better implementation by jcraft which can be used instead,
> >>
> >> but
> >>
> >> > it
> >> > is not in the SVN right now since it has to go through the Eclipse
> >> > intellectual property process first (the code has to be checked to be
> >> > compatible to the Eclipse public license before it can be committed)
> >> >
> >> > If you want you can download the latest revision of the trace view
> >>
> >> plugins
> >>
> >> > (if
> >> > you are only interested in the trace view you can use the trace view
> >> > plugins
> >> > without the other g-Eclipse plugins since there are no dependencies)
> >> > and apply
> >> > a patch to use the other zlib implementation.
> >> >
> >> > The patch to apply is at:
> >> >
http://www.mnm-team.org/~koecker/jcraft_inflater.patch<
http://www.mnm-
> >> >
team.org/%7Ekoecker/jcraft_inflater.patch>
> >>
> >> <
http://www.mnm-team.org/%7Ekoecker/jcraft_inflater.patch>
> >>
> >> > You also need to add the jcraft implementation to your workspace, the
> >> > project
> >> > can be found at:
> >> >
http://www.mnm-team.org/~koecker/com.jcraft.jzlib.zip<
http://www.mnm-t
> >> >
eam.org/%7Ekoecker/com.jcraft.jzlib.zip>
> >>
> >> <
http://www.mnm-team.org/%7Ekoecker/com.jcraft.jzlib.zip>
> >>
> >> > > I was
> >> > > wondering if the Trace Viewer delivered as part of the g-eclipse
> >> > > RPC
> >>
> >> was
> >>
> >> > a
> >> >
> >> > > stable version of the plug-in. If it is, where could I find the
> >>
> >> sources?
> >>
> >> > I would recommend to use the current trunk version from the
> >> > repository, since
> >> > as mentioned there are no really important TODOs and it should be
> >> > quite stable.
> >> >
> >> > > In general: is there a development roadmap and if yes, is there
> >>
> >> already
> >>
> >> > a
> >> >
> >> > > planning concerning release dates?
> >> >
> >> > The 1.0 release on
eclipse.org is upcoming (afaik the current blocker
> >>
> >> is
> >>
> >> > some
> >> > paperwork) and the current trace viewer (maybe with minor changes)
> >> > will also
> >> > be in this release.
> >> > The work on the trace viewer part of g-Eclipse is mainly done by
> >> > people currently working on their thesis and features are added as
> >> > needed. But, as always for Eclipse projects, wishes, contributions,
> >> > patches and
> >>
> >> bug
> >>
> >> > reports are always welcome.
> >> >
> >> > If you have further questions feel free to ask.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Kind regards,
> >> > Thomas
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > geclipse-dev mailing list
> >> >
geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geclipse-dev mailing list
> >>
geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev
>
_______________________________________________
geclipse-dev mailing list
geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev