Re: AW: [geclipse-dev] Usage of JSDL Plugins

[Thomas Köckerbauer <tkoeck@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

> In that context I would like to propose a change of the plugin strategy
> of our jsdl stuff. Following our rules we should only have two plugins
> for jsdl, eu.geclipse.jsdl and eu.geclipse.jsdl.ui. I think it is very
> clear which functionalities go where. On the other hand as we agreed
> having jsdl as our standard job description we could also think about
> completely absorbing jsdl in the core, i.e. moving the eu.geclipse.jsdl
> to eu.geclipse.core and eu.geclipse.jsdl.ui moving to eu.geclipse.ui. We
> already have basic jsdl functionalities in the core - think about the
> JSDLJobDescription.java. So what are your opinions on that?
>
>
>
> 1)       Should we leave jsdl like it is?
>
> 2)       Should we migrate jsdl to 2 plugins, eu.geclipse.jsdl and
> eu.geclipse.jsdl.ui?

As I see it the reason to have several plugins is that there is autogenerated 
code which is held separate from the normal code, I think it is a good idea 
to have such a sparation.

> 3)       Should we absorb jsdl in the eu.geclipse.core and
> eu.geclipse.ui?

I think we should not put things into the core where is no need to put them 
there. In my opinion there are even to many things in the core right now and 
it would be good to move things that are not necessary there somewhere else. 
If we put to many things in there its hard to have an overview of the core 
plugin.


Regards,
Thomas