Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:00:21 -0400
Delivered-to: equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev>
List-help: <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev>, <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev>, <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)

* Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-08-10 18:47]:
> There was some talk a while ago of creating a /usr/share/java for such
> things. Given that the .jars are architecture independent (even if
> some of their contents aren't) I'd vote for not splitting the bundles
> arbitrarily.

We have /usr/share/java for architecture-independent jars already.  If
the contents aren't architecture-independent, I'd argue that the jars
themselves shouldn't be considered architecture-independent.

Andrew

Attachment: pgpYe72MC9Nxp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout
  - From: Alex Blewitt

References:
- Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout
  - From: Jeff McAffer
- Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout
  - From: Andrew Overholt
- Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout
  - From: Alex Blewitt

Prev by Date: [equinox-dev] [prov] Provisioning weekly meeting minutes
Next by Date: [equinox-dev] [prov] need a 1.5 JVM if generating metadata from latest code
Previous by thread: Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout
Next by thread: Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Shared install filesystem layout
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs