[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [equinox-dev] Footprint of equinox
- From: "John Wells" <jwells@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:36:00 -0700
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AcaKWyxuKqH12ZXYSDSEokoGWdGgZAAFrNUg
- Thread-topic: [equinox-dev] Footprint of equinox
I wondered this myself. We've got some of our stuff running on a "slug"
so obviously it is small enough for that, but it sure would be great to
have it take up even less space on devices like that!
John Wells (Aziz)
[mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ?? ??
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:51 PM
Subject: [equinox-dev] Footprint of equinox
Knopflerfish 2.0.0 RC1, which seems compliant to OSGi Spec R4, was
released in May. http://www.knopflerfish.org/download.html
I found that the footprint of Equinox framework is much larger than one
(framework.jar in knopflerfish_osgi_tiny_2.0.0-RC1.jar)
The web page tells that "org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.0.v20060601.jar" contains
additional mechanisms (e.g., x-internal, platform filters, ...). That
must be one of reasons.
Was there anyone or project who tried to make a package which contains
only fundamental OSGi framework function ( minimal equinox) ? (If there
is, could you tell me how much was it?)
NTT Cyber Solutions Lab.
equinox-dev mailing list
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.