Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [epp-dev] Question on M6 builds ....

I checked one particular package (the RCP/RAP package) and it seems to pick up the new artifacts without any problems. Everything looks good!

Regarding the changes of the tooling and root IU's: Can you point me to a bug or other documentation that summarizes these changes?

Thanks,
Markus

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No need to worry but I'll have a closer look into the build results tomorrow:

There are messages in two build steps:

* install.buckminster:these are the typical "Could not install bundle ... has already been installed" messages that appear if Buckminster is already there
* build.site: "Warning ...feature... cannot be resolved" - these features are not copied into the target that EPP uses during its (p2 metadata) build and therefor there is a warning. It may be confusing, but it's harmless. The 'real' features are only necessary in the EPP package build job with the p2 director.

Thanks,
Markus


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:10 PM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've done some "warn up" builds to common repo (staging) to make sure the Platform's new Tycho/Maven based build "fits in" and it does seem to, there. I then kicked off an EPP build to make sure EPP would still build with some of the more subtle changes, and it too seemed to produce something close to what it normally does.

But ... there are lots of warnings in the logs, such as

https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/kepler.epp-repository-build/47/console

and I'm wondering if it is a valid test? Or is it just rebuilding M5 content?

In any case, would appreciate a quick, early peek from the EPP experts (i.e Markus :) before our +0 day just to make sure I'm not fooling myself with "the build runs, therefore it works" fallacy.

There was some "low level" changes that most people never see, such as the exact names of "root" and "tooling" IUs and I figure it those changes effected anyone, it would be Buckminster and/or EPP builds ... so, just looking for a quick confirmation that all is well.  (Well, good enough for M6 at least :)

Thanks,


_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev


Back to the top